Red Hat Enterprise Linux Reviews

Pros

What I like most about this distribution is how stable it can be once implemented. Also that it is very secure when it comes to data handling, vulnerability and unauthorized access, it is a distribution for server and business use

Cons

That it is a complex distribution as far as the user is concerned, it is not for users with little experience, but for advanced users of linux

Alternatives Considered

Switched From

Reasons for Switching to Red Hat Enterprise Linux

Pros

The support from the red hat enterprise is very good. The enterprise-level features offered by RED HAT ENTERPRISE LINUX makes it one of the best candidate for enterprise applications. The memory management is quite well and it is almost compatible with every major enterprise-level software available in the market.

Cons

The GUI and support can be improved. Different official customizable GUI should be available. Official RHEL Desktop (GUI) container should be made available.

Alternatives Considered

Reasons for Switching to Red Hat Enterprise Linux

Pros

It's an open source, Kernel is good, This is safe and secure OS. OS installation is very easy also. Easy to understand, Services installation process are easy and commands are understandable also.

Cons

I have been using this OS on server level since from long time. I have faced OS Stuck (Lack) issues many times. Faced the lacking issue same more time while uninstalling any Program or services.

Pros

I used Redhat Enterprise Linux for developing and deploying custom client/server applications using the Java Socket API. The main motive behind this development is to test the performance of SSL Sockets compared to normal Sockets using the Java Server Socket Extension API. We deployed the client and Server code on separtate Linux VMs and we managed the virtualization using the Vmware VSphere virtualization server. We realized a very good server concurrency of the JVM on RHEL compared to Kali and Ubuntu. This is the main advantange we depicted in RHEL that made it a very suitable enterprise platform for server-side code. The plan is to test with other programming languages for developing the server code such as in Python and C++ to see if we can generalize the performance enhancement compared to other Linux platforms.

Cons

RHEL is a bit laggy when loading a GUI desktop environment. Although this is not the duty of an Enterprise Server environment to provide sophisticated desktop services, we believe that this could enhance the user experience during the development and deployment phases of the enterprise application.

Pros

My main encounter with RedHat Enterprise Linux is when I worked on the development and deployment of a home automation server with IoT integration support. I used RHEL for managing the communication with the IoT gateway and in the statistical analysis of collected sensor data. I applied many probabilistic sketching techniques on top of it and with huge amounts of IoT data the server performed dramatically well even with several IoT polling mechanisms and multi-threaded server functions. Very smooth network configuration processes makes RHEL a perfect server platform that abstracts a lot of the Linux intricate configuration complexities. Highly recommend it for enterprise server deployments even on a large scale.

Cons

Many functions are still command-line based which makes dealing with it by Linux beginners a bit hard.

Pros

It is a open Source OS.
It is more stable than Windows.
It's simple to install, write, and compile code in various languages.

Cons

Identifying the dependencies of certain packages and finding their dependencies could be simpler.

Pros

The Linux OS provides various features to use it as a server to host large web applications . The OS has got best security and always get regular updates. The memory management is something which is handled exceptionally well.

Cons

The UI could have been better comparing it to the other OS providers in the market.

Pros

A robust and professional software with a long tradition and used by developers. Was it first platform to administrate s server for calculation.

Cons

Is it a bit expensive for a small business and is it difficult to administrate by a beginner in Linux system administrator.

Alternatives Considered

Pros

What I liked most about this distribution is that it has a very friendly interface and as a web designer and developer it was very pleasant to use this operating system, also that it has a very robust file system with libraries 100% adaptable to the tools I use to develop. , where it was easy to create and set up my environment.

Cons

Which can be a bit pricey, but it's worth it for the amount of features it has

Pros

Red hat is more powerfull and all the features are upgraded from ubuntu interface is clean and easy to use and even who don't have powerfull machine they also run and test this os in Virtual machine as they gives lot of features that made our life easier i really happy to using rhel in my administration
Rhel provides various os like server side os,home os , command line ui

Cons

This is open source operting system but many of the websites allow to download this os and they include viruses in the file so i wanto to request rhel to check the websites that providing this file and stop them to avoid the customer loss of data

Pros

Red Hat Enterprise Linux stability, reliability, and security features makes it an excellent choice for organizations that need a secure and stable operating system..also it's high level of compatibility and customization is top notch and not forgetting it's top security level

Cons

I haven't encountered any problems or negative effects using Red Hat Enterprise linux

Pros

The most appealing aspect of Red Hat Enterprise Linux is its stability. With Red Hat Server, you get a 10-year support life cycle. This means you can deploy a server and not have to worry about upgrading it for a decade. This is a big selling point for businesses that want to avoid the hassle and expense of regular upgrades. Additionally, Red Hat Enterprise Linux is backed by a team of expert developers who are always working to improve the software and address any security issues that arise.

Cons

There were a few things that I didn't like about Red Hat Enterprise Linux. First, the documentation was not always clear. Second, I found the package management system to be confusing. Finally, I didn't like the way that the system handled updates and security patches.

Pros

-Support :Redhat support having very professional calibers that handle customer cases professionally and find needed issues solutions quickly.
-Stability
-Frequently updates
-Ease of use
GDevelopment and its an Opensource project.

Cons

Desktop GUI need to be more light and stable

Pros

I have been using this Linux distro for 2 years and I can't say that there's anything it doesn't do well. The installation is quick and straightforward and you know what you're getting with a Red Hat. Its always reliable, up to date & works on both my laptop and desktop without any additional configuration.

Cons

I recently switched to RHEL and couldn't be happier. I've been a Linux user for years now, and I was looking for something that would provide me with stability and flexibility. It's not perfect, but it's everything I need.

Pros

As a Linux enthusiast, Red Hat Enterprise Linux has been my favorite operating system for years. I love its reliability, improved security features, and how it gives me the tools to customize it to my liking. I've used many different distributions in the past, but none quite as impactful as this one!

Cons

I never felt bad for using this. So I can recommend it.

Pros

I have been running RHEL on my server for 2 years now and it has been rock solid. I was a little worried about the move to Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8, but the upgrade process was painless and the new features are really good.

Cons

I've been using Red Hat Enterprise Linux for years. It's one of the most stable and reliable operating systems I know of. I recommend it to all my friends who need a great OS.

Pros

I've been using Red Hat Enterprise Linux for years. I tried Ubuntu a couple of times and was always frustrated by the lack of support or stability. Now that Red Hat Enterprise Linux has joined the Open Source world, I'm cautiously optimistic this will change.

Cons

When it comes to open source operating systems, Red Hat Enterprise Linux is the best one. It has a long history of use and updates. You'll also never have to worry about your data being stored in proprietary formats.

Pros

Operation System with high performance, security, stable and many other gains.

Cons

No cons, very well, nothing cons, but the price is a little expensive.

Alternatives Considered

Reasons for Switching to Red Hat Enterprise Linux

Pros

I've been using Red Hat Enterprise Linux for years and it has always served me well. It's in my opinion the best version of Linux on the market and worth every penny. I have never had any issues with it, which makes everything so much easier. The updates are always speedy and flawless and I never worry about downtime because of a security flaw or something like that.

Cons

Red Hat Enterprise Linux is the best Linux. So there is no downside as my point of view.

Pros

Distribuzione molto solida, con una buona gestione delle risorse ed una velocità generale tutto sommato buona, sia per piccoli progetti che per architetture complesse

Cons

La tendenza ad eliminare applicazioni opensource per virare verso soluzioni proprietarie al fine di far pagare nuove licenze di uso non ci piace molto (vedi tomcat/jboss, portainer/docker, ansible). Le alternative sono comunque installabili ma non rientrano nei pacchetti che vengono patchati e aggiornati dal team redhat.